The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 12, 2017, at around 00:04, at around C, the Defendant called up at around 00:04, at around 00:04, the Defendant received 112 reports pertaining to the obstruction of business pursuant to the Defendant’s state revocation column, and asked the Defendant to the security guards E of the police box affiliated with the police box at the river station where the Defendant asked him/her about his/her personal information. As such, the Defendant had expressed his/her face several times.

The Defendant assaulted E in the course of performing the legitimate duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provides for the legal provisions on criminal facts;

1. Determination of a suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Recommendation type of sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to one year and six months;

2. Decision of punishment: to recognize errors;

A person was under the influence of alcohol to commit a crime.

There is 4 years of a fine.

It seems that the police officer seems to be able to see it together with a bath, but it was unfortunate, but there was no real physical contact.