However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2016 Highest 1713"

1. On December 16, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseed Driving) on December 16, 2016, the Defendant driven a B-sale car without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 500 meters from the front of a static meat restaurant, which was located on 68 Don-ro 168 a.m. a.m. 16 December 16, 2016, to the 56-1 p.m. Don-ro Don-ro n.

"2017 Highest 32"

2. On December 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) on December 22, 2016, the Defendant driven a B-owned car in the section of about 200 meters from the front right of the public bus terminal located in the 106-dong Ho-ro, 535-ro, Simpo-ro, Simpo-si, Simpo-si on December 22, 2016 to the front right of the 525-ro, Simpo-si, Simpo-si.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Criminal facts constituting a highest 1713]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses (A) (criminal facts of the order of 2017 senior group 32 criminal facts);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Motor Vehicle Driver's License Register (A);

1. Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection, the community service order and the order to attend a lecture, has a record of being punished several times for the same crime, and even if the investigation was conducted by regulating the crime under Article 62-1 (1) of the judgment, the crime under Article 62-2 (2) of the judgment has not been committed one week, and it is inevitable to punish the defendant even in order to prevent recidivism.

However, considering the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that there is no record of the same punishment exceeding the fine, etc., the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc.