2. The crime of this case is not deemed to be a good quality in light of its circumstances and the specific form of act. In particular, in order to establish the state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. that is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself; (b) has compensated for damages related to the damage of public goods; (c) has been favorable circumstances, such as the primary offender; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; (b) the environment; and (c) other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.