However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:20 on May 20, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim with a large voice, “as the victim, 3, E, etc., to return home from the victim D, who was called the Daejeon Western Police Station C District, and the victim, who was reported by the Defendant on May 20, 2012 that the Defendant was sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually insulting the victim.”

2. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph (1) above, continued to d's desire to take care of the situation belonging to the Daejeon Police Station C District, who was dispatched to the site for the foregoing reasons, or demanded that D go home to the district at the level of protection measures for the hosts, and that "in the city, d' is d't the district, d', and carried the d's f's f's b's b's b's b's b's b's b's b's b's b's hand, and d's f's f's b's b's b's hand, and d's f's f's f's f's b's f's f's b's c

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Photographs;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental disability by drinking alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. According to the records, even though the defendant was found to have drinking alcohol to a certain extent at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case and the police officer D called up at the time of the crime of this case stated that "the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case was the same as that of the defendant," the defendant lacks the ability to discern things at the time of the crime of this case and make decisions.