In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 50,000 won.

The Defendants are workers working in the Youngdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si and the executive officers of the metal labor union-dong-dong-dong-si

Defendants conspired, on March 25, 201, at around 08:30 on March 25, 201, hold Yeongdeungpo-dong branch meetings at the above Young-dong factory to the same year.

3. On May 9, 2011, the head of the factory of the damage company raised an issue that the head of the factory of the damage company caused damage company damages the public notice of Laina District Association ( a trade union organized as an Arabic factory workers of the damage company) and sent this fact to its members, and obstructed the business of manufacturing engine parts of the damage company by force by forcing its members to refuse to work and to make collective retirement at the time, such as the table of crime Nos. 1 and 2 attached hereto, and by posting a notice of the order to eliminate the remaining business of all its members and the extraordinary workers from May 12, 2011 to May 17, 2011 by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness M, N andO;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Written statement by prosecution;

1. Trial records for each of the Daejeon District Court's 201 High Highest 164 cases; and

1. The defense counsel asserts that the defendants did not have ordered the members to refuse to work. The defense counsel's defense counsel's defense counsel's defense as to whether the copies of each public notice and the main business of the Youngdong Factory are open to the public.

First, March 25, 2011