명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. Around 11:00 on February 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) made a statement to the effect that, while the Defendant was holding a meeting with respect to the appointment of a closed-class director at the 60 regular meeting of the E major meeting located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim A had a 800 full-time member with a 800 full-time member and the Defendant, the chairman, the chairman of the board of directors; (b) even though the victim had not damaged a loudspeaker with a short-time loudspeaker at the Seocho-gu Community Center at the general meeting of May 2, 2007, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “This portion of the Defendant’s speech before making a short-time speech with a loudspeaker at the Seocho-gu Community Center at the general meeting of May 2, 2007, which caused damage to the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.
2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement attached to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intent not to be punished against the defendant on September 24, 2015, which is after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.