A. Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 is followed.

A. (1) On May 4, 2012, the Plaintiff, among the instant buildings, leased (hereinafter “instant factory”) a deposit of KRW 100 million, monthly rent of KRW 400,000,00 (excluding value-added tax) to the Defendant, and the lessee, upon termination of the lease, planned to restore the instant factory to its original state.

(2) The Defendant paid a lease deposit and installed a container of 21 square meters on the part of the instant building (A) connected each point of No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 among the instant building in sequence to each point of No. 8, 9, 11, 10, and 8, and installed a container of 21 square meters on the part (B) connected each point of No. 8, 9, 11, 10, and 8, respectively, from May 15, 2013 to August 30, 2014, as the Defendant did not pay a monthly rent or a monthly rent of a unpaid rent of 65 million won until August 30, 2014, and the unpaid surcharge of 6.6 million won and the unpaid surcharge of 6.6 million won and the unpaid charge of electricity of 3 million won.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute between the parties, or a statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the instant lease contract was terminated upon delivery to the Defendant on June 19, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant did not pay two or more months of monthly rent.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to remove the building installed in the factory of this case as its reinstatement and order the plaintiff to order the factory of this case.

2. On the judgment of the defendant's defense, the defendant does not have a duty to order the factory of this case until the deposit for lease is returned.

When a lease contract is terminated, the lessor's obligation to return the deposit and the lessee's obligation to specify the object of lease are concurrently performed.

Therefore, the defendant is entitled to the lease deposit to the plaintiff.