According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance and asserted only mental and physical disorder and unreasonable sentencing for reasons of appeal.

In such cases, the argument that there is an error of mistake in part of the judgment of the court below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, it is just that the court below rejected the defendant's claim on the mental and physical disorder on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of mistake or misapprehension of legal principles

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.