beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2021.03.25 2020노3144

특수상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Legal principles are the injury inflicted by the defendant at the time of several times on the face and hair of the victim.

The defendant suffered injury to the victim, etc. due to the acts committed by the victim, etc. due to the steel strawing by the defendant

there is no evidence to determine the person.

The victim's face is close to the other place, such as the victim's face side and the other side is close.

Therefore, the defendant should be punished as substantive concurrent crimes with the crime of injury and special assault.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of misapprehension of the legal principle, the defendant was diagnosed that the defendant abusedd the victim as stated in the facts charged, and the victim was treated as an injury at the medical corporation Maton Lina on May 11, 2020 due to the above assault by the defendant, and the victim was diagnosed that the victim was diagnosed as requiring fixed alcohol treatment and care and care and care, and the victim was in need of care from May 11, 2020 to June 8, 2020 (28 days from the diagnosis date) (Evidence No. 43 of the evidence record), and on May 13, 2020, the victim was diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having been in need of the victim's injury on the left-hand side (the evidence No. 6 of the record No. 82) at NO hospital located in the Republic of Korea on May 13, 2020, the victim was diagnosed as having been in need of the victim's injury on the left-hand side.

Therefore, it is found that the defendant committed an injury to the victim by carrying dangerous articles.

It is sufficient to accept the recognition.

The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty as to the charges of special injury against the defendant is just, and there are errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as alleged by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

. The defendant-appellant.