If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around 22:05 on 04. 04. 22:05, the Defendant: (a) stopped the amount of E-car and waited for a winter in order to have the entire victim D ( South and 18 years old) returned home on the road in front of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and the latter part of the road; and (b) the Defendant was able to take a walk at the same place.

Accordingly, the victim was ‘Ized ‘.' The victim opened a door for a car and boomed by single hand on the ground that the flap gum gum fe is in place, and the victim was sprinked with a flap that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The fact-finding inquiry reply letter (F-type and National Assembly member) found guilty of the facts charged in this case, and injury in the crime means that the injury inflicted upon the victim’s physical integrity or physiological function is hindered (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 9Do4305, Feb. 25, 2000). The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below are as follows. In other words, the defendant: (a) was able to see the victim’s fingers into the window with the driver’s seat opened by the victim at the time of this case; and (b) caused the victim’s chest face several times in the window frame behind the driver’s seat; (c) the victim complained of serious pains on the front side of the chest; and (d) the victim complained of serious pains on the front part of the body of the victim; and (d) the victim was under charge of the victim’s doctor’s treatment once after photographing, and (e) the victim was in charge of the victim’s chest with the upper part of the front wall.