2. The fact that the Defendant confessions and reflects the instant crime, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, etc. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex, and thus, in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, the Defendant repeated the instant crime even after receiving a fine of KRW 3 million from the place of the instant crime at June 2014, by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s act of arranging sexual traffic was committed at the place of the instant crime and receiving a fine of KRW 3 million; and (b) the Defendant’s age, character and environment, circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.