When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2017. 8. 12. 10:25 경 부산 영도구 남 항로 31번 길 15에 있는 퀸 페로스 아파트 앞 노상에서, 주 취 여성이 길에 쓰러져 있다는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동하여 주 취 여성을 귀가시키고자 순찰차에 태우려 하고 있는 부산 영도 경찰서 소속 경위 B(50 세 )에게 다가 가 “ 씹할 개새끼야, 왜 납치를 하느냐

“The purpose of this study is to prevent the patrol car from being closed.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, as a matter of course, threatened the face of the above B by drinking to the effect that the Defendant’s warning defect that the said B would not interfere with the performance of official duties.

Accordingly, B arrests the defendant as the current criminal who interfered with the execution of official duties.

In addition, as the grounds for arrest and the right to appoint a counsel are notified, the defendant abused B's face at two times in drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of each police statement protocol to B and C

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;