However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 15, 2020, the Defendant 22:52 around Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, "C" in front of "C", and "boomed with drinking alcohol".

/ The need to search for a portable phone by tracking the location of the police box affiliated with the police box of the Ulsan Southern-gu Police Station D, Ulsan-do Police Station, which was called "no male name/ no deadly weapons, etc." after being reported to the 112 person, and shall receive the case from E as it is difficult to check whether the lost mobile phone was destroyed due to a crime.

Inasmuch as “the procedure is known and the head of a Si/Gun/Gu does not undermine the location tracking of the party head’s home,” it is close to the money to pay taxes in 30 million won.

Does flort flor;

씨 발 새끼들, 개새끼들.” 이라며 욕설하면서 E의 가슴을 쿡쿡 찌르고 같은 소속 순경 F의 상체를 어깨로 밀쳤다.

The Defendant continued to inform E of the absence of any further details after finishing the explanation, and then, to get on the patrol and preparation for a 112 report, and to leave the scene by getting on the patrol team No. 62 to get out of the site, “this so-called ‘this so-called urine, and what is obvious for him,” and even if his parents do this day, she shall do so.

D. As C.C., the police station assaulted about 10 minutes, such as 10 minutes of the police station, by stating that “I am in order to arrest, I am I am.”, and preventing the movement of the knife with the body by raising the knife at the core of the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. G statements;

1. 112 Application of the 112 Report Processing List, Photographs and CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with labor for one month to five years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria [the types of offenses impeding the performance of official duties].