2. The Defendant’s KRW 190,000,000 and its amount from May 11, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

A. On October 11, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to purchase the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from Nonparty C in the purchase price of KRW 650 million (hereinafter “instant purchase contract”), and the Plaintiff actually paid KRW 90 million out of its own charges to the Defendant. The KRW 100 million was replaced by the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s separate D real estate investment case with KRW 100 million that the Plaintiff agreed to receive settlement from the Defendant, and the remaining KRW 135 million was intended to receive a loan from the financial institution. The Defendant unilaterally completed the registration of ownership transfer under the Defendant’s sole name, and the Defendant is obligated to perform the registration procedure for ownership transfer with respect to shares of KRW 1/2 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not conclude such agreement.

B. Reviewing the reasoning of the judgment, each of the evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7, 11, and 12 can be acknowledged that the Defendant and one other agree to purchase the instant real estate from Nonparty C for the purchase price of KRW 650 million on October 11, 2016, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of Defendant solely for the instant real estate on February 17, 2017, the Plaintiff transferred the total amount of KRW 90 million to the Defendant, including KRW 40 million on October 11, 2016, KRW 50 million on January 17, 2017, and KRW 90 million on January 17, 2017. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff is a joint purchaser of the said sales contract, and even if so, the Plaintiff cannot seek the registration of ownership transfer against the Defendant directly, the Plaintiff’s primary claim for ownership transfer cannot be considered without any other reasons.

2. Determination on the conjunctive claim

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion is the cause of this part of the claim.