손해배상(기)
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs asserted that, since the defendant suffered bodily injury by taking the plaintiff Gap's apartment arms against the plaintiff Gap, the defendant is liable for all damages suffered by the plaintiff Gap and his family members.
The key issue of the instant case is whether the Defendant inflicted an injury upon Plaintiff A by cutting the Plaintiff’s arms in excess of the above Plaintiff.
The testimony of the public health team, Gap 2 and 7-1, 2, 13 through 22 and witness G is insufficient to recognize this, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.
Rather, according to the evidence No. 1, although the defendant was prosecuted for the above injury, this court stated on September 8, 2016 that "(i) the defendant consistently from the investigative agency to this court, stated that there was no fact or tension with the plaintiff A, and that there was no desire to see the plaintiff A; ② At the present site, H testified testified that there was no fact that the defendant would be able to knife the plaintiff; but the investigative agency did not clearly state that the defendant and the plaintiff were knife and knife the plaintiff A, but the defendant did not clearly state that knife the plaintiff and the plaintiff were knifeed, and knife the plaintiff et al., (ii) the defendant did not state that knifed the plaintiff et al., and (iii) the nursing record paper attached to the complaint and investigation report that the plaintiff A was sent back to the front body, and (iv) the plaintiff was out of knife that it was difficult for the defendant to knife and k.