The defendant is the representative director of D (ju), D (former E), and F, the representative director of D, the defendant, and the person who applied for a loan in the name of the same corporation, the defendant excluded from the defendant as the representative director of D, and the person who applied for a loan in the name of the same corporation.

The Defendant and F agreed to take over (State) A, which is in the de facto crisis of the closure of business due to the lack of a purchase performance, to manipulate the details of purchase sales, to prepare a false financial statement, and to submit a false financial statement, and to obtain a loan from a bank, etc. after receiving necessary documents for the loan. The Defendant and F decided to take charge of the role of the representative director of the company to which the Defendant take over and the representative director of the company, and F to carry out the loan from the financial institution using the loan hub.

According to such public offering, the Defendant and F et al. received (State)E with no record of purchase on May 2014, and changed the trade name to D. (State), and (State) made a false financial statement as if the sales amount of D would be equivalent to KRW 1.5 billion in 201, KRW 3.5 billion in 2012, KRW 4.3 billion in 2013, KRW 4.5 billion in 2013 billion in 201, and prepared a false financial statement as if it would be equal to KRW 4.5 billion in 2014, and prepared a false document of a factory lease in preparation for the actual inspection of the factory related to the loan from a financial institution.

1. Around October 27, 2014, the Defendant and F, etc. of the Victim Exchange Bank prepared false financial statements as seen above, and, around October 27, 2014, by submitting false financial statements, etc. to the lender at the central point of the two locations of the Victim Exchange Bank in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the Defendant and F, etc. deceptioned that sales worth worth KRW 1.5 billion in 201, KRW 3.5 billion in 2012, KRW 3.5 billion in 2013, KRW 4.3 billion in 2013, KRW 4.55 billion in 2014.

However, in fact, D did not have the intention or ability to repay the loan even if the loan had not been sold for the period from 2011 to 2014.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with F, deceivings the victim, and is subject to this, 30 million won from the foreign exchange bank.