2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On August 31, 2004, the Plaintiff asserted that he was discharged from military service on December 21, 2005 on the part of the Defendant on December 22, 2005, and applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on June 22, 2005, which was recognized as falling under the “requirements for Military Security” on April 27, 2006, but was determined as falling short of the criteria for classification of disability ratings subsequently implemented. On June 19, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for registration to the Defendant on the re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on December 21, 2005, and applied for re-registration to the Defendant on June 19, 2012, the Plaintiff was re-registered as falling under the requirements for subsidization of injury in the part of the right side of the Defendant, and thus dismissed.

B. On October 28, 2014, the Plaintiff claimed that the right kne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne sne se sne sne sne se sne se sne sne se sne sle sne sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle sle (hereinafter “instant difference”), and applied for a re-registration of persons of distinguished service to the Defendant, “disaster

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 5, 6, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion that when moving by using knenee, the plaintiff will continue to use knee for 30 to 40 minutes of low-feas, and the running of kne seems to have been repeated, and the weight-centered toward port is prone, resulting in the flow of kne and knee to the left side and knee.