손해배상(기)
1. The defendant stated in attached Form 2. The name of "the name of the plaintiff" in the "the name of the plaintiff" in the attached Table 2.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. During the period from June 28, 1950 to July 17, 1950, the head of the Dong-gu Daejeon District Court: Jeju 43 Incident that was detained in the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of the War; the inmates, political and thought-related crimes, general criminal offenders who were sentenced to imprisonment with labor for not less than ten years, and reported members who were detained in preliminary autopsy in the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of the Republic of Korea and were detained in preliminary autopsy in the Daejeon District of the Republic of Korea, during the period from the end of the end of the period from June 28, 1950 to the end of the period from the end of July 17, 1950 near the Busan District of the Daejeon District of the Republic of Korea.
(hereinafter referred to as the "Sacrific sacrifice case of Daejeon District"). (b)
The former History Settlement Commission established pursuant to the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for the Truth and Reconciliation of the Decision of the former History Settlement Commission for the Reconciliation of the Truth (hereinafter “Reconciliation Commission”) (hereinafter “Reconciliation Commission”) shall receive an application for ascertaining the truth from the persons related to the Daejeon-type Unsubsting Incident and investigate the case on June 22, 2010 (amended on December 7, 2010).
2. In the case of “AA” in the list of 36 victims indicated “3. AA”, the written decision on the case of sacrifice of a prison inmate in the Daejeon Chungcheong District was indicated as “AB,” but the victim’s age [the same as A’s age at 22 years of age at the time of birth, a transcript of the evidence No. 4-2], a convict list [the list of convicts (A, evidence No. 87)], a convict list [the list of convicts (A, evidence No. 87), evidence No. 87], and Jeju 4.3 Park Mon (A, evidence No. 88-3 of evidence No. 88), and AB’s sentence on February 2, 198, “AB” under the written decision was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 9.3 years and sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 9.4 years during the period of 19.4 years of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the Daejeon District.