However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 24, 2014, at around 02:45, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in front of the building in Ulsan-gu B building, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S., the Defendant: (b) sought panty in front of the Defendant’s wife; (c) sought panty in front of the victim’s seat; (d) sought her disturbance; (d) her disturbance; and (e) her fluencing the victim’s seat; and (e) her brusium, “Ikh Hakh Hakh Hakh Hakh Hakkh Hakkh Hakkh knkh knkh kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

2. When the Defendant was arrested as an offender in the act of damaging property and assault by means of a slope F belonging to the Ulsan Central Police Station Escopic Police Station Escopic, which was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report on the above act at the above time, at the above place, the Defendant expressed that “Iscopic, I would am scopic, I would am scopic, I would am scopic, but if I am scopic, I would am scopic, I would am scopic, I would am scopic,” and that I would assault F when I am on the left hand of F and interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Harmful products and photographs of victims;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (verification of failure to submit a written estimate and repair costs);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) of the same Act (the point of causing damage to property), and Article 136 (1) of the same Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act -

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no other penalty force except for a fine once, the victim of damage to property does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the fact that the mistake is divided);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;