토지수용에 대한 보상금증액
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project name: C development project (hereinafter “instant project”);
(2) Public notice, etc.: The amendment of the development plan and the approval and public notice of the implementation plan (D) on September 18, 2009; and the approval and public notice of the amendment of the development plan and implementation plan on November 5, 2010 (E) 3 project implementer: Defendant
B. Subject to expropriation decision 1 on June 14, 2013: The date of commencement of expropriation of F forest land No. 1,653 square meters in Sejong-si, the Plaintiff’s ownership: Compensation for losses: The amount of compensation shall be calculated based on the arithmetic average value of each appraisal result calculated by the appraisal appraisal appraisal corporation (G appraiser, one appraisal corporation) as of October 12, 2012, based on the attached Table 1, as of June 14, 2013, based on the method of calculating the amount of compensation as of October 14, 2012: The Central Land Tribunal 19,511,900 square meters in size: the appraisal corporation’s dialogue and appraisal corporation’s appraisal report (hereinafter “appraisal appraisal corporation”) written in the attached Table 1, 2013 as of June 14, 2013.
(D) The amount of compensation shall be calculated as KRW 72,300 per square meter on the basis of the arithmetic mean of the respective appraisal results of each appraisal: 251,256,000: 2) the appraiser H (IE; hereinafter “court appraiser”) of this Court.
As of October 12, 2012, the amount of compensation shall be calculated as KRW 152,00 per square meter as of October 12, 2012, such as the court appraisal column in attached Table 1. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including the provisional number, the result of entrustment of market price to the appraiser of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. Although the instant land is designated as a green area in urban planning, each land, such as J, L, M, N, andO (hereinafter “instant neighboring land”) is used as a residential area, and the utility value of the instant land is greater than that of the instant neighboring land.