If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 23, 2012, at around 02:05, the Defendant was recommended to return home after receiving a solution from the police officer belonging to the said district group, as a matter of the E and mobile phone loss of the taxi at which the Defendant was posted within the D District located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the police officers belonging to the said global group “this son works at the seat of the said global group; (b) 50 minutes of a fluort fluor; (c) f, the police officers belonging to the said global group, are able to have the Defendant returned to the Defendant; (d) f, the police officers belonging to the said global group, are able to have the Defendant returned to the Defendant; and (e) f, with the face of the said global group twice, has interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of the verification of CCTVs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;