beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2012.04.12 2011고합106

살인미수교사

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than four years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 200, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Changwon District Court on June 8, 200, and completed the execution of the above punishment on June 8, 200. On January 26, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution for one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Changwon District Court’s Tong District Court’s Tong Branch branch on January 26, 20

The defendant is the wharf of Cmph, which is a domestic violence organization in the Tong-young area, and D (Co-defendant in a consolidated case prior to the separation of pleadings) is the person who is engaged in cable broadcasting business by additionally obtaining permission for K, L, M, and N reclaimed land from the head of the above Cmph, E to the behavior members of the above organization, F to the person who inferred the above organization, and the victim G (34 years of age) to the Government in relation to cable broadcasting, and then by obtaining the right to permit the business territory of Tong-si, Ha, I, and J to the cable broadcasting business from March 201.

A victim G was requested from D, which had a frighten relationship with O around June 2001 due to the expansion of cable broadcasting business, to be in a frighten relationship with other competitors in a common area such as O, etc., but rejected it.

On July 2001, the Defendant received the direction from the above D to “G work”, and attempted to kill the victim by mobilization of the associates.

The Defendant, immediately after receiving D’s instructions, left P, Q, R et al., and then, “the president of the cable broadcasting company has to work. There is no choice but to die and live together. It would make it possible for the Defendant to live together. Even if the Defendant was discovered, he would be able to look back from 3 years to 5 years and live together.” The Defendant instructed the police to “at once close,” and sent off his cell phone in preparation for the police’s mobile phone analysis, and carried out a preliminary practice for the purpose of murder by explaining the place where the Defendant committed the crime, but all of the P, R et al. escaped.

Accordingly, the defendant is in front of the Shoman in early August 2001.