However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2013 Highest 1990"

1. The fraud C, D, and E (the prosecution of April 8, 2013) with respect to the mobile phone owner is a person who engages in the business of soliciting documents using a mobile phone opening through telemarket and purchases approximately 4,50,000 won per case through the Internet Messen, and sells and sells to the mobile phone seller at least 53-5770,000 won per case to the mobile phone seller, and then assists the document raiser in selling documents through the mobile phone opening to the mobile phone seller.

On the other hand, when collecting documents through a mobile phone opening, Defendant, C, and D obtained a large number of information from customers via the Internet even though they had no intention or ability to provide loans to customers, and then made a loan to customers without permission. There is a way to enable them to do so even if the credit rating of customers is not good. There is a way to provide a loan to customers. There is a communication class, but only three months after opening a mobile phone and maintaining a mobile phone for more than three months. On the other hand, it is possible to provide a loan due to high communication level. On the other hand, since it appears only to have opened a mobile phone and it is not actually opened through a mobile phone opening, it is difficult to know that the mobile phone charges or the payment of the mobile phone opening is not imposed at all. 3 months after opening a mobile phone opening, it is possible to provide a loan by moving the name of the mobile phone opened in the name of another person and raising the communication rating of the customers. Accordingly, it is possible to request the mobile phone opening sales business entity to send documents such as a copy or a copy of the personal seal impression.