Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 30,000 won shall be one day.

around 15:19 on July 23, 2016, the Defendant driven a C-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A written statement of D [witness D] was made in a very concrete and consistent manner as to the background leading up to the detection of the Defendant in this court, the Defendant’s speech and behavior at the time of the detection, the response of the Defendant after detection, etc. There is no inconsistency with the content of the statement or any part contrary to objective circumstances, and the appearance or attitude of the statement is very natural. Moreover, there is no reason for the witness D to unreasonably control the Defendant by specifying the Defendant, and in particular, there is no incentive for the witness D to attend the court and to bear the risk of perjury and to give a false testimony. Accordingly, according to the testimony of D with credibility, the facts charged in this case can be fully recognized

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 6 of Article 156 and Article 50 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which selects the penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;