beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2020.06.12 2019고단2518

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for one year and six months for fraud, etc., and on July 26, 2017, on August 3, 2017, the Suwon District Court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment for fraud in the branch court of Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive, and the sentence of the said suspended sentence was invalidated, and the execution of each of the said suspended sentence was terminated on October 18, 2018.

On August 17, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 9, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

around April 2017, the Defendant made a false statement that “C” in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C,” the victim D would be able to supply livestock products to the reporters of E religious organizations in which inside the country is normal. The Defendant changed KRW 10 million in terms of introduction and activity expenses.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he was thought to use it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, and the victim did not have the intention or ability to deliver livestock products to the members of the E religious organization.

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the post office account (F) under the name of the Defendant on April 5, 2017. On October 31, 2018, the Defendant acquired KRW 10.6 million in total by receiving KRW 6 million from the said post office account as additional expenses.

On March 2017, 2017, the Defendant “2019 Highest 2559” sentenced the Victim G to “E religious organization doctrine well-known by telephone. To supply 200 million won per month to the Women’s Training Center of E religious Organizations, the Defendant made a false statement that “The amount of KRW 10 million is remitted as the down payment.”

However, even if the defendant received the down payment from the victim, he was thought to be used for his personal purpose, and did not know the person who was in charge of E religious organization doctrine, he could supply the victim's meat to the Women Training Center of E religious Organizations.