beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.09.06 2018고합46

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours against the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Gohap 46"

1. On July 16, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (such as the purchase of sex), committed an act of purchasing child or juvenile sex by drinking up 150,00 won for the price of sexual traffic to G and having 150,000 won for sexual intercourse with G on the ground that he/she was in a mobile phone (Eel) in a mobile phone-type app F, and through a mobile phone-type app F.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes (use photographing such as a camera, etc.) set up a camer in the form of key in front of the elTV, at the same time, at a place as set forth in the above paragraph 1, and at the same time, at a place where the said victim G entered a bath room, and photographs the victim’s sexual relation images.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

3. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media) and the Defendant of intimidation: (a) on August 16, 2017, the victim G satis on dialogue with the victim’s own H, and (b) the victim G satis on dialogue with the victim’s own H, thereby blocking the Defendant’s H message.

말하자 “ 나 너 사진 있는데 ㅋㅋ, 벗은 사진 ㅋㅋ, 너랑 할 때, 나 만나주면 용돈은 줄께, 다음 주에 만 나, 그때 지워 줄게

“Along with the victim’s sexual intercourse, as described in paragraph (2) above, the images of the screen image taken early on the face of the victim’s sexual intercourse were sent.

Accordingly, the Defendant reached the other party with a view to inducing or satisfying his own or other person's sexual desire, and the Defendant, on the basis of having sexually related dynamic images, made the victim take advantage of the fact that the Defendant had sexually related dynamic images, thereby threatening the victim, as if the Defendant did not let the victim spread the sexually related dynamic images.