If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 31, 2015, around 01:00, the Defendant stolen with one handphone in the market price, which is the victim's possession on the chest, the victim C was under the influence of alcohol and was in the influence of the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not only the criminal defendant who has been punished several times for the same crime, but also the criminal defendant committed a second offense during the grace period after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime is very unfavorable to the criminal defendant.

However, considering the fact that the value of stolen objects is not significant and that the damage was recovered as a result of the return to the victim immediately after seizure, that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and that the defendant reflects his mistake in depth.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.