beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.10.25 2013고단820

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C before the Agricultural Cooperative located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Self-Governing Province of the Republic of Korea, stating that “I will immediately return it, if I would like to use it for the first time, if I would like to use it for the first time, because I would like to use it for the first time after the birth of his or her birth in Daegu

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to repay even if they borrow money.

Therefore, it received two million won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

2. On December 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the above victim, “I wish to have a debt repaid within the number of days if he/she borrowed the debt, if he/she borrowed the debt more than the debt.”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to repay even if they borrow money.

Therefore, it was obtained 6 million won from the victim and acquired 6 million won.

3. Around December 14, 2011, the Defendant concluded that “A new bank located in the Dong-dong Kimhae-si lent KRW 15 million to the said victim’s friendship, but if he/she wishes to confirm the head of the Tong that he/she lent, he/she would create a KRW 15 million if he/she borrowed the head of the Tong that he/she borrowed and requested to return it, and immediately return it.”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to repay even if they borrow money.

Therefore, it received 9.5 million won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

4. On April 5, 2012, the Defendant rendered a false statement that “If he/she gets divorced and divorced, he/she would be paid consolation money to the above victim. He/she borrowed money from his/her arms to complete payment.”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to repay even if they borrow money.

Therefore, it received 4.5 million won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement C in the second interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant at the police;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A complaint;