However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the execution of punishment shall be suspended.

(b) the defendant;

On March 26, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Busan District Court's Branch Branch.

On January 22, 2020, at around 23:05, the Defendant driven DB car while under influence of alcohol with approximately 3km alcohol concentration of about 0.121% from the 3km section of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu to the front road located in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, and investigation reports (reports on confirmation of the same type A of suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose to impose a penalty on the criminal facts [Selection of imprisonment in consideration of the circumstances of recidivism, etc., in which the criminal defendant has served as a fine and imprisonment, even though he/she has

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., the traffic history of the accused prior to ten years, and circumstances against his/her own mistake, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the preceding conditions);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;