(a) recognition and public notice of the project - Project name: D development project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The public notice of the project: - Project operator E, etc. on August 8, 2008 - the Defendant

(b) The adjudication of expropriation made on June 17, 2014 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal - The objects to be expropriated and the compensation shall be as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”). Compensation for the area of land category of the owner (land size) shall be 1,307 274,012,312,90 B B B before the 1,307 B G before the 1,307 274,012,550 - The date of expropriation shall be August 14, 2014: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25518, Aug. 14, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25477, Aug. 14, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 2507, Feb. 3, 200

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on December 18, 2014 - The content of the ruling: Dismissal of the appraisal corporation: The Korea Appraisal Board, the fact that there is no dispute over the Korea Appraisal Board, the Korea Appraisal Board, the fact that there is no dispute over the dispute, the entries in subparagraphs A(1) and 2(including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' alleged acceptance ruling and the compensation amount for losses under this ruling were assessed excessively because they mistakenly selected the comparative standard or failed to properly meet the standards for goods, so the defendant should pay the difference between the compensation amount reasonably determined according to the court appraiser's appraisal and the compensation amount determined in the appraisal.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. In a lawsuit involving an increase or decrease of one compensation, each appraisal agency’s appraisal and the court appraiser’s appraisal based on the expropriation decision are not illegal in the appraisal methods, and there is no other reason to believe that there is an error in the appraisal result due to a somewhat different difference in the appraisal results, either of them is one of the appraisal methods unless there is any evidence to prove that there is an error in the content of the individual assessment comparison among them.