However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 8. 14. 02:40 경 상주시 냉림 2길 115에 있는 3 주공아파트 201 동 옆 길에서, “ 같이 술을 마신 동료가 행패를 부린다” 는 신고를 받고 출동한 경북 상주 경찰서 B 지구대 소속 경위 C 와 경사 D이 만취하여 길에 누워 있는 피고인을 귀가시키기 위해 피고인을 부축하여 일으켜 세우려 하자, “ 내가 E이 다, 이 새끼들 너 흰 나한테 안 돼 개새끼들 아 ”라고 욕설을 하고, 주먹으로 위 D의 배 부위와 얼굴 부위를 각 1회 때리고, 왼쪽 발로 위 C의 왼쪽 볼 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each report on internal investigation (No. 3 through 5, the evidence list);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution, public officials who perform their official duties on the grounds of sentencing (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) and in particular, officials who are in charge of social safety and security in the highest line should be strictly informed of acts impeding official duties by violence against police officers in charge of public security.

However, the court shall take into account the favorable circumstances in which the defendant recognizes and reflects a crime, and shall determine the punishment as ordered in the light of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments and records of this case.