A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 15, 2015, Defendant A: (a) around 01:40 on Mapopo-si, the victim B (27 taxes) and sipo-si; (b) the victim B (27 taxes) and sipo-si, and (c) the victim’s head was inflicted two-time injuries, such as an open wound, where approximately two weeks of treatment is required, on the one hand, on the part of the victim’s head.

2. The summary of the evidence reveals that the Defendant: (a) was assaulted by the Victim A (33) as described in paragraph (1) at the time, at the place, and as described in paragraph (1) at the time and time, and as described in paragraph (1) at the time of the assaulted by the Victim A (33 years); (b) when the Victim F (33 years of age) was met by the Victim F (F) who was a police officer of the Victim A; and (c) when the Victim F (33 years of age) was met by the Victim F (F), when the Victim F (F) was taken care of the Victim F, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Victim F, i.e., taking approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and (d) when the Victim F (F) was taken care of the Victim F, such as

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (A), injury diagnosis certificate (F), injury diagnosis certificate (B);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act of Defendant A

B. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act of Defendant B (Optional to imprisonment)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant B), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reduction of volume (Defendant A) Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the following grounds for sentencing);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1148, Apr. 1,

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order (Defendant A) appears to be against the Defendants who recognized the instant crime, and the Defendants do not want to be punished under mutual agreement, and the victim F does not want to be punished under the victim F. Defendant B did not have any past criminal history, and the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime.