However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above defendants is against the defendants.

No one shall provide game products not classified by the Game Rating Board for use, conduct speculative acts by using speculative gaming machines, or exchange the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

1. The Defendant’s joint criminal conduct with Defendant A received customers from the game room located in the head of Sung-gu Dtel E of Changwon-si, the game room is in charge of operating the game room, such as receiving results of the game, exchanging the game products, and singing among customers, and C conspired to provide the game machine of the above game room, recruit customers, and manage the game machine.

From November 10, 2017 to January 4, 2018, the Defendant and C installed 18 game “G” game machine, which is a speculative machine with three kinds of game products, such as “F,” which was not classified in the said game site, and had many and unspecified customers who find the place start the game by inserting a paper into the said game machine, dividing the beginning server, and, in a case where the number or picture on the screen conforms to a street or a large angle, four points for free gifts are given, and they exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% fee per point from the points obtained to customers, according to the points obtained by them.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified by the Game Rating Board in collusion with C for use, conducted speculative acts by using speculative gaming machines, and exchanged the results obtained through games.

2. The Defendants’ co-principal committed the act of operating the above game room, such as Paragraph 1, at the game room located in the head of Sungwon-si Htel I, and Defendant B conspired to manage the money exchange and game room in the above game room.