If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 00:00 on July 7, 2020, the Defendant solicited the Defendant to return home from the slope D belonging to the Daegu Water Station C District of the Daegu Water Station, which was called after receiving a report from 112 that the Defendant “the drunk fluored” was located in Daegu Water Station B, and the said slope flusing the Defendant. As the Defendant fluenced the arms of the said slope, the Defendant flusing the Defendant’s face part of the said slope flusium at once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report investigation and internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the error of the defendant in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to be minor, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following factors: the defendant is against the defendant, there is no record of crime other than two times prior to a fine; the defendant deposited the prescribed amount for the victim; the defendant's age, environment, means and result of the crime (the degree of intimidation and assault) and circumstances after the crime, etc.