On November 10, 2011, the Defendant prepared a false complaint against D with the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment from the Defendant’s house located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 8 Dong 202, and submitted it to the employee under his name in the public service center of the Seoul Guro Police Station in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day.

그 고소장은 “고소인과 피고소인은 결혼정보회사 E 온라인 사이트에서 알게 되었습니다. 피고소인인 2011년 11월 05일 01:00경 인천 월곶에서, 술을 먹여 인사불성인 고소인을 집에 데려다 준다고 차에 태운 후, 상호불상 모텔로 강제로 끌고 들어가, 의식을 잃은 고소인을 침대에 눕히고, 옷을 벗기고, 고소인이 강간한 것입니다. 피고소인은 계획적으로 고소인을 강간하기 위하여 술은 소주와 맥주를 섞어서 마시자고 권하고, 고소인이 술을 못한다고 하니까, 산사춘을 시키더니 술을 빨리 마시고 깨야한다며 빨리 마시기를 유도하며 원샷하라고 하여, 먹지도 못하는 술을 과음하게 되었고, 의식을 잃은 고소인을 강제로 끌고 들어가 강간한 자로, 철저히 수사하여 처벌하여 주시기 바랍니다”는 내용이었다.

However, the facts are that D forced a criminal defendant who has lost the awareness of drinking to the above her mother, and not rapes the criminal suspect by taking advantage of the unknown condition after being led to the above her mother, but sexual intercourse by entering the above her motherel under the agreement with the criminal defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not dismiss D as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the chief commissioner (investigative record, title 1, title 50);

1. Grounds for conviction under Article 156 (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. According to the Defendant’s examination and the defense counsel’s argument, the summary of the pleading and the Defendant’s statement attached thereto, the following arguments are presented.