On August 17, 2015, the Defendant entered his name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the column of “her husband ( husband)” of the party to a marriage without authority for the purpose of exercising the marriage report form kept at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu Office (Seodong, Seocho-gu), with the intention of using a verification body, and entered the name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the column of personal information of the party to the marriage report form, and entered “E”, “F”, “F”, “Seoul Metropolitan City Kim-si, the base date for registration,” and “Seoul Seocho-gu, H 302” into the personnel column of the wife, and completed the marriage report with E by submitting it to the employee of the Seocho-gu Office in non-name, Seocho-gu, Seoul, who works there.

For the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the marriage report, which is a private document related to the rights and obligations of E, and exercised it as if it was a document duly formed.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, when Korean nationals in foreign countries have completed the marriage procedure in accordance with the method of the country, the marriage is duly constituted. However, the parties shall submit a certified copy of the marriage document prepared in accordance with the method of the country to the competent diplomatic mission or the agency dealing with registration of family relations and report it to the competent foreign diplomatic mission or the agency dealing with registration of family relations, and such report is reported, so the parties can be deemed as either party or an interested person who is not a party. In this case, the parties should submit a certified copy of the marriage document only to the overseas diplomatic mission, etc., but in practice, matters necessary for the records of registration of family relations in accordance with