However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a school member belonging to the Committee on Countermeasures against the Chown-gu Emergency of the Chown-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee, opposing D pastors who have a dispute over the status of the Chown-gu Council in Gangseo-gu.

On October 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 15:20 on October 14, 2018, up to 30 members, who support D pastors from the 1st floor of the D D D D D D, had the wall bed out of the screen by selecting a TV monitoring line for the purpose of interfering with the towing and reporting the towing.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the worship of the members supporting Crown D pastors.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (related to examination of evidence or images related to interference with distribution), investigation report (related to the analysis of video recording and the telephone conversations with victims);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to video CDs [the defendant's behavior constitutes obstruction of worship, in full view of the situation in which the galle was relayed by TV monitors, the number of the members they reported, and the actions taken by the above members in TV monitors by viewing TV monitors];

1. Article 158 of the Criminal Act and Article 158 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that occurs in the course of dispute within the church, the fact that the members of the group supporting D pastors and the members of the group opposing the D church agree with each other to terminate church disputes in the future and engage in church activities smoothly, and the fact that the complainant appeals against the defendant without wanting criminal punishment against the defendant according to the above agreement, etc. shall be considered);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (where a sentence of suspension of execution of punishment becomes void or revoked and the defendant fails to pay a fine);