If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

피고인은 2013. 8. 13. 01:30경 진주시 B에 있는 C파출소에서, D이 피고인에게 폭행당한 사건에 관하여 파출소에서 경찰관과 상담을 하는 것을 알고 파출소로 찾아와 진주경찰서 C파출소 소속 경위 E, 경위 F에게 “야, 씨발 놈아 나도 세금 낸다. 개새끼야”, “개새끼야 죽여 버릴라, 너 두고 보자 씹새끼”라고 욕설을 하면서 이를 만류하는 경위 F의 낭심 부분을 피고인의 무릎으로 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police boxes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, E, and D;

1. Application of F and E Acts and subordinate statutes to the accusation house;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On August 22, 2013, the summary of the charge of assault, among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant assaulted the victim D (the age of 51) living together with the Defendant on the second floor of HJ located in Jinju-si, G on August 12, 2013, and assaulted the victim, such as taking the victim’s face at least three times as he / she takes a bath to “Sspawn” while taking a dispute with the victim.

2. The judgment is the case that falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code and cannot be punished against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. According to the written agreement submitted, the victim D can recognize the fact that the victim D has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.