If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

1. The fact of forging private documents was not held by the board of directors on July 15, 201, with the content that the representative director of the Co., Ltd. C (hereinafter “C”) is replaced, and D does not have consented to the preparation of the minutes of the board of directors related thereto. However, D arbitrarily prepared the minutes of the board of directors as if D attended in order to meet the quorum of the board of directors.

On July 15, 2011, the Defendant appeared at the meeting room of the head office of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul E-building 508 on July 15, 201, by using a computer, and held a board of directors at the meeting room of the head office of the board of directors, and prepared three copies of the minutes of the C’s board of directors to the effect that G resigns resigns and is appointed as a new representative director, and affixed a seal of D’s arbitrarily made on the side of the said “D for internal directors.”

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged three copies of the minutes of the board of directors in the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. On July 18, 201, the Defendant filed an application for alteration registration with respect to the registration for the alteration of the Franchi District Court 75 Suwon-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and the registration official who is aware of the forgery, submitted the forged social minutes as if they were duly formed, and made the registration official resign from 8 persons, such as internal director F, etc., and made eight persons, such as G, to register the change of his office as an internal director. At that time, the Defendant had the registry keep the corporate register stating the falsity as above.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged private documents, made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the corporate register in the same electronic records as the original of a notarial deed, and exercised the corporate register, which is a false official electronic record.

A prosecutor shall have any false statement entered in the corporate register.