However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim B(22) are the same relationship with the company that uses the same accommodation.

피고인은 2018. 4. 17. 19:00 경 거제시 C 건물 202호 거실에서 와이 파이 공 유기를 이용하여 스마트 폰 게임을 하고 있는 피해자에게 와이 파이 공 유기를 같이 사용하자라고 요구하였으나, 피해 자로부터 “ 제가 공 유기를 샀고 공유 기도 제가 사용하는 거실에 있으니까 혼자 사용할 수밖에 없어요

” 라는 대답을 들으며 거절당하자, 화가 나 위험한 물건인 자동차 열쇠를 오른손에 움켜쥐고 열쇠의 뾰족 한 금속 부분으로 피해자의 뒤통수 부위, 오른쪽 목 부위, 이마, 왼쪽 광대뼈 부위, 왼쪽 턱 아래 목 부위 등을 각 1회 씩 내리찍어 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료가 필요한 목 부위의 열상 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Photographss and criminal tools photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of violent crime, and that the defendant agreed with the victim is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the degree of injury inflicted on the victim is not less severe than that of the defendant.

In addition, various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.