2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake is divided, that the Defendant partially repaid the amount of damage to the victims as a profit, and that the instant crime has to consider equity in the case of concurrent crimes with the judgment at the same time under Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to which the judgment has become final and conclusive and the concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

However, the crime of this case is not very good; the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and even during the period of repeated crime of the same crime; the frequency of the crime is high and the amount of damage is high; the defendant did not agree with the victims up to the trial; the defendant's age, sex and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case such as the defendant's age, sex and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime are after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.