업무상횡령
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unfair sentencing) recognizes and reflects the error of the defendant; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment; (c) is leading to the delivery; and (d) deposit of KRW 30 million for the victim C Co., Ltd., the sentence of the lower court sentenced to three years of imprisonment is too unreasonable.
2. The facts alleged in the grounds of appeal are that the defendant embezzled approximately KRW 630 million in total while working as an accounting employee of the victimized company, and it is not good that the defendant embezzled about KRW 630 million in total while in charge of fund management; the damaged company did not recover damage; and the injured company wants to punish the defendant; the circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are already reflected in the sentencing, and there are no special changes in circumstances that may be considered in the court below at the same time; and the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered in full view of all the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., the above assertion is not reasonable, since
3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.