except that this judgment.

1. Defendants A, B, and C jointly operate a sexual traffic business place with the trade name “H” in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Gtel 312, 516, 805, and 1003.

피고인들은 2016. 10. 경부터 2017. 5. 31.까지 위 성매매업소에서 인터넷 ‘I’ 사이트 등을 통해 D 등 성매매여성들을 고용하고, 인터넷 성매매 알선 사이트 ‘J’ 등에 ‘A 코스 60분 원 샷 130,000원, B 코스 90분 투 샷 210,000원, C 코스 120분 투 샷 260,000원’ 이라는 글 등을 게시하여 업소 광고를 하고, 이를 보고 찾아온 불특정 남자 손님들 로부터 성매매대금 13만 원 내지 26만 원을 받고 성매매여성이 있는 오피스텔 호 실로 안내한 후 성매매여성들이 손님들과 성 교행위를 하도록 하였다.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On May 31, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 1.60,00 from K which had been a guest and received KRW 1.60,00 from K which had been a guest as stated in the above paragraph 1, around 14:10, and had sexual intercourse with it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to L;

1. Written statements;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each daily account book per heading 3 and 4 of seized evidence;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Each internal investigation report (a report on the verification of the H site);

1. Additional collection charge: The portion of the statement that the profits of the Defendants per brokerage of sexual traffic was KRW 50,000 among the suspect interrogation records against the Defendants, and the 1,372 Acts and subordinate statutes applicable to the defendants' statements and the number of times of arranging sexual traffic recognized by the division of each of the above businesses, which are submitted as evidence.

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A, B, and C: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant D: Act on the Punishment of Acts such as brokerage of sexual traffic.