2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the charges that the Defendant committed an indecent act on the victim’s chest part with the intent to commit an offense with the intent to commit an offense by the prosecutor are proven beyond reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

(1) The Defendant had no intention to commit an indecent act on the part of the victim’s left part in the process of leaving the victim’s seat in order to suggest the victim’s seat, from the police to the next neck of this Court.

The facts charged are stated and the charges are denied.

② According to CCTV images in which the Defendant’s contact with the victim in the facts charged was taken by many people, etc., in order to take the victim who was fluenced by the Defendant due to drinking alcohol, etc., the Defendant suggested the victim’s left chest part of the chest part of the victim’s chest part by his hand, etc. one time, and the victim refused it, and the victim refused it, and the victim returned to his table, and the part on the chest part of the chest part of the victim’s chest part was fluent by a timely action, and it does not seem that the Defendant attempted to commit an indecent act on the part of the victim’s chest part.

③ At the time, the victim was using a cell phone by cutting two arms on the table, so there is also the possibility that the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, would have been damaged on the chest part of the victim’s left gate.