The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

B On February 6, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months on the grounds of interference with funeral ceremony at the Seoul Central District Court on February 6, 2015, and the decision became final and conclusive on October 29, 2015, and Defendant A is the head vice-chairperson of metal labor unions D, and Defendant A is a member of the metal labor union

1. On March 25, 2014, at around 15:11 on March 25, 2014, the Defendants who interfere with their business entered the F branch located on the 10th floor of the Jongno-gu Seoul building, Jongno-gu Seoul, and on the same day around 15:17 on the same day, Defendant A and the boxes of the above names will “A/S of the G company broken together with citizens.”

A person who has sustained flag in the color of "......."

At that place, Defendant B and the persons without the above name will continue to extract customer number tickets and Defendant A and the persons without the name above will consider the company.

In the form of “A4” and without complying with the order of priority, the victim H and the employee of the F branch who refrains from exercising the right to exchange a ship with the exchange of the ship without any error, and the victim H and the employee of the F branch to refrain from doing the fire.

As above, the Defendants conspired with 21 infinites, thereby obstructing the repair business of the victim’s telecommunications products by force for about 45 minutes.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Noncompliance with the joint withdrawal) did not leave the above place to continue demonstration as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, even though the Defendants received a demand from the victim H, the representative of the said branch, to leave the said place on March 25, 2014, around March 15:21, 2014.

As a result, the Defendants jointly refused to comply with the demand of the victim to leave with 21 persons who did not have the above name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecutor with respect to the prosecution;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Evidence photographs;

1. Investigation report (related to the attachment of CCTV at F branches);

1. USB images;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: the text of the judgment (2014 highest order, 3633.