However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant reported to 112 the substitute driver and the substitute driver while stopping the Defendant’s vehicle at the center of the road, on December 20, 2016, in front of the customs office of the 20 Busan Central Headquarters, as the Busan Central Headquarters was located in around 20 Busan Central Headquarters, and on December 20, 2016, the Defendant reported to 112 the substitute driver while stopping the Defendant’s vehicle at the center of the 112 Report Center.

“Around the 112 Report, the victim E, who was sent to the site after being reported to the Busan Central Police Station C District of the Busan Central Police Station C District, was sent to the site, and the victim E, the same background, “I am or 12 Report, I am or am dead, I am or am dead, I do not need to am or am dead. I am or am, because I do not have to do so. I am or am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am dead on the road. I am am again from the victims to the center, so I am am fright of the victim D while drinking at one time, and pushed the victim E by pushing the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention of crimes and accidents, handling of 112 reports, and protecting people's lives.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense. Article 136 (1) of the said Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment] There is no person (from June to one year and six months) in the basic area (the person subject to special sentencing) (the person subject to special sentencing) (the decision of sentence] [the police officers in mobilization who did not make any error on the grounds of complaints against the handling of 112 reports] set forth in Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act in a considerable period of time.