However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around October 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) boarded a D taxi driven by the victim C at the entrance of the apartment complex of the 1st apartment complex of the Gecheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Gecheon-gu, Gecheon-gun, Gecheon-gu, Gecheon-do, Gecheon-ro, Gecheon-gu, Gecheon-do, 8 Sintain-ro, without paying KRW 4,00, out of the taxi charges; (b) leaving the site; (c) making the victim check the site; and (d) entering the E convenience store in the vicinity of the victim; and (e) putting the victim into a beer, making the victim 2 sick; and (e) making the victim threatened with the victim by raising a shock beer disease, which is a dangerous object.”

2. The Defendant: (a) caused the above intimidation at the above date, time, and place; (b) caused damage to the victim C; (c) caused the said intimidation, and (d) destroyed the said shoulderer’s disease, which is a dangerous object to close the door and try to depart from the taxi in the instant taxi, the owner of the victim’s tobacco transport; and (c) caused the 50,000 won of the repair cost to be broken off by the string of the taxi, following the string of the taxi.

3. The Defendant causing property damage: (a) took the victim’s bath at the above E convenience point managed by the Victim F, and (b) took a beer 2 disease in the market value of the victim’s 7,000 won, which was in the cooling room between the victim and the victim’s flock, and then damaged the property by breaking it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. C’s statement;

1. The investigation report (as for the amount of taxi damage)

1. Application of taxi damage photographs and statutes on-site photographs;

1. Articles 284, 283 (1), 369 (1), 366, and 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant, while threatening a person, has broken the beer's disease and had the person go against the vehicle.