beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2021.02.17 2018가합104516

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants jointly share KRW 549,272,669 and KRW 124,733,543 among them, from May 9, 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 13, 2018, the Suwon High Court (No. 2018No. 438) convicted Defendant B of the following criminal facts and rendered a judgment of two and half years of imprisonment with prison labor, two years of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant C, and three years of suspended execution for Defendant C (hereinafter “relevant criminal judgment”); and “relevant criminal cases” in compliance with the above criminal procedures.

1. Defendant B, while engaging in the business embezzlement of Defendant B using the Defendants Company D, was in charge of the Plaintiff Company E’s inventory management, instructed F, etc., a logistics team employee of the Plaintiff Company, to pay KRW 500,000,000 per month to D (hereinafter “D”) for the payment of KRW 1 million from KRW 500,000 per month of the goods of the Plaintiff Company, to arbitrarily deliver the Plaintiff’s goods to Defendant C’s representative, and to embezzled the Plaintiff’s goods.

On October 30, 2013, Defendant B conspired F, an employee of the logistics team, with the company’s e-mail, to send the following goods D to D and release them into D, as well as to have H stock goods owned by the company (hereinafter “H”) from December 21, 2012 to August 28, 2015 (attached crime Nos. 1 through 18, 20 through 22, 24 through 27), and the market value of the goods owned by the Plaintiff (attached crime No. 1 through No. 29 to 40, 45 through 69, 77 through 82, 10 to 108, 132, 134 through 1538, 165 through 37, 165 through 178, 165 through 17, 375, 165 through 17, 200.

Defendant C, despite being aware of the fact that Defendant C’s storage of the goods that Defendant C had not actually purchased in order to embezzled H and the Plaintiff’s inventory goods, he stored the goods embezzled by Defendant B in the warehouse of D, thereby making it easier for Defendant B to commit the crime of occupational embezzlement.

2. Defendant B’s occupational embezzlement in collusion with Defendant B’s K stock of H’s E products.