직무유기
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. In the event of school violence, etc. in the gist of the grounds for appeal, the obligation to report or notify the principal of the school, etc. falls under the principal’s inherent duties concerning the education of the principal of the school and teachers, and the obligation to report or notify the principal of the school, etc. shall be deemed to fall under the principal’s inherent duties concerning the education of the principal of the school and teachers, and the failure to take necessary measures in accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes despite the absence of
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that Defendant A worked as a teacher in charge of the F of the foregoing student F at E Middle School located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, around March 2014. Defendant B served as the director in charge of the human rights personality of the foregoing school. Defendant C is a public educational official who served as the principal of the above school.
1) In the course of counseling with F on March 4, 2014, Defendants A and C were aware of the fact that F was damaged by sexual assault from three students, including G, H, and I, who are students of the same school, and reported it to Defendant B and C, the principal of the school, who is the teacher in charge of school violence. In this case, Defendants as public educational officials of middle school under the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (hereinafter “Juvenile Protection Act”), did not report the occurrence of sex offenses against children and juveniles to the investigation agency immediately despite their duty to report to the investigation agency immediately. Since the former North Office Office of Education established the above sexual assault case on June 12, 2014, the former Office of Education of the North Office of Education of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the former Office of Education”). Accordingly, Defendants conspired to act on behalf of the Defendants on March 4, 2014 without justifiable grounds.