We reverse the guilty part of the defendant's case.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for life.

The judgment below

(2).

A. (1) The Defendant and the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) misjudgments the facts, did not have any intention to kill the Defendant at the time of committing each of the instant murder, attempted murder, and murder.

Dob. The sentencing of the lower court on the sole basis of unreasonable sentencing (30 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

나. 검사 ⑴ 사실오인(무죄부분) ㈎ 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등주거침입)의 점 범행 당시 살인미수 범행으로 지명수배 상태인 피고인이 장갑 낀 손으로 칼을 소지하고 신발을 신은 채 피해자 P의 주거(교회 사택)에 들어간 점에 비추어, 피고인은 도피자금 마련을 위해 재물을 강취할 것을 마음먹고 위 사택에 들어간 것으로 보이므로 거주자인 피해자의 반대의사가 추정되어 주거침입죄가 성립한다.

㈏ 강도살인의 점 피고인은 타인의 재물을 절취 또는 강취할 목적으로 위 사택에 침입하여 피해자의 반항을 억압하기 위해 칼로 피해자를 찌르는 폭행을 가하였는데, 이러한 폭행을 개시함으로써 강도죄의 실행의 착수에 이르렀다고 할 것이고, 이 사건은 피고인이 강도의 기회에 살인행위를 한 경우에 해당하여 강도살인죄가 성립한다.

【The sentencing of the lower court on the ground that the sentencing of an unreasonable sentencing is too unjustifiable.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts was identical to the grounds for appeal in the court below, and the court below rejected this part of the assertion by stating in detail the decision the "decision on the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion" under the title of "decision on the defendant

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no illegality of misconception of facts as alleged in the grounds for appeal.

3. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts

A. (i) The lower judgment.